eISSN: 3023-6940
  • Home
  • Comparison of early experience laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy in terms of clinical, oncological and renal functional outcomes

Original Research

Comparison of early experience laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy in terms of clinical, oncological and renal functional outcomes


1  Amerikan Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
2 Istanbul Medeniyet University, Department of Urology, Istanbul, Turkey
3 Ataşehir Memorial Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey


DOI : 10.33719/yud.2021;16-2-792827
New J Urol. 2021;16(2): 116-123

Abstract

Objective: In this study, we aimed to com-pare the success and complication rates of in-tercostal and subcostal aproach in percutaneo-us nephrolithotomy.

Material and Methods: We evaluated the data of 165 patients operated at Diskapi Yil-dirim Beyazit Training and Research Hospital Department of Urology Clinic between April 2006-January 2009 for isolated upper-mid pole caliceal group stones, staghorn kidney stones and complex lower calicial stones with subcos-tal triangulation or intercostally. Subcostal tri-angulation patients were grouped as 1 (n:118) and intercostal cases were group 2 (n: 47).

Results: Mean ages of group 1 and group 2 were 44±16,3 and 44,1±13,3 respectively. Mean duration of operation time was 118,9±46,8 min and 122,1±49,5 min (p=0,32). Scopy times were 15,10±3,25 min and 6,56±5,06 min (p=0,18). The post op 6 hours heamothocrit loss was 6,46±3,94mg/dl and 5,86±4,4mg/dl (p=0,12) for group 1 and 2 respectively. Reentry ma-lecott removal time was, 3,03±2,41 days and 3,39±2,6 days (p=0,10). Residual stone sizes were 102.73±26,4 mm2 and 118±34,6 mm2 for both groups respectively (p=0,11). Duration of hospitalization was 4,53±3,8 days and 5,08±3,1 days (p=0,05) respectively. Pneumothorax and heamothorax complications were not present in either groups.

Conclusions: Intercostal access is as safe as the subcostal access when the access is per-formed between 11 and 12th intercostal spaces according to lung complications. In this way, we determined that stone-free rate, blood loss, operation, hospitalization and scopy du-rations were similar in both groups.

Key Words: Kidney stones, percutaneous nephrolithotomy


Abstract

Objective: In this study, we aimed to com-pare the success and complication rates of in-tercostal and subcostal aproach in percutaneo-us nephrolithotomy.

Material and Methods: We evaluated the data of 165 patients operated at Diskapi Yil-dirim Beyazit Training and Research Hospital Department of Urology Clinic between April 2006-January 2009 for isolated upper-mid pole caliceal group stones, staghorn kidney stones and complex lower calicial stones with subcos-tal triangulation or intercostally. Subcostal tri-angulation patients were grouped as 1 (n:118) and intercostal cases were group 2 (n: 47).

Results: Mean ages of group 1 and group 2 were 44±16,3 and 44,1±13,3 respectively. Mean duration of operation time was 118,9±46,8 min and 122,1±49,5 min (p=0,32). Scopy times were 15,10±3,25 min and 6,56±5,06 min (p=0,18). The post op 6 hours heamothocrit loss was 6,46±3,94mg/dl and 5,86±4,4mg/dl (p=0,12) for group 1 and 2 respectively. Reentry ma-lecott removal time was, 3,03±2,41 days and 3,39±2,6 days (p=0,10). Residual stone sizes were 102.73±26,4 mm2 and 118±34,6 mm2 for both groups respectively (p=0,11). Duration of hospitalization was 4,53±3,8 days and 5,08±3,1 days (p=0,05) respectively. Pneumothorax and heamothorax complications were not present in either groups.

Conclusions: Intercostal access is as safe as the subcostal access when the access is per-formed between 11 and 12th intercostal spaces according to lung complications. In this way, we determined that stone-free rate, blood loss, operation, hospitalization and scopy du-rations were similar in both groups.

Key Words: Kidney stones, percutaneous nephrolithotomy