A total of 172 patients were included in the final analysis. The median age was 67 years, median IPSS was 21, median Qmax was 9.0 mL/s, and median PVR was 100 mL. The median eGFR was 84 mL/min/1.73 m² (Table 1).
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the study population
| Variable |
Value |
| Age (years), median (IQR) |
67 (63–72) |
| BMI (kg/m²), mean ± SD |
27.6 ± 4.0 |
| Total PSA (ng/mL), median (IQR) |
3.0 (1.6–9.0) |
| PV (mL), median (IQR) |
65 (50–87.5) |
| IPSS, median (IQR) |
21 (18–24) |
| Qmax (mL/s), median (IQR) |
9.0 (7.2–11.4) |
| Qavg (mL/s), median (IQR) |
4.0 (3.1–5.2) |
| PVR (mL), median (IQR) |
100 (45–150) |
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m²), median (IQR) |
84 (72–91) |
| Serum creatinine (mg/dL), median (IQR) |
0.93 (0.83–1.04) |
Abbreviations: IQR, interquartile range; SD, standard deviation; BMI, body mass index; PSA, prostate-specific antigen; PV, prostate volume; IPSS, International Prostate Symptom Score; Qmax, maximum urinary flow rate; Qavg, average urinary flow rate; PVR, postvoid residual urine volume; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate.
Spearman’s correlation analysis showed that PVR and age had a moderate negative correlation with eGFR (both p < 0.001). In addition, no significant correlation was observed between eGFR and BMI, PSA, PV, IPSS, Qmax, or Qavg (all p > 0.05) (Table 2).
Table 2. Correlation between eGFR and clinical parameters
| Variable |
Spearman rho |
p value |
| Age |
-0.453 |
<0.001 |
| BMI |
-0.096 |
0.209 |
| Total PSA |
0.012 |
0.880 |
| PV |
-0.135 |
0.078 |
| IPSS |
-0.079 |
0.304 |
| Qmax |
-0.105 |
0.172 |
| Qavg |
-0.052 |
0.501 |
| PVR |
-0.356 |
<0.001 |
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; PSA, prostate-specific antigen; PV, prostate volume; IPSS, International Prostate Symptom Score; Qmax, maximum urinary flow rate; Qavg, average urinary flow rate; PVR, postvoid residual urine volume; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate.
Median eGFR values were generally lower in the higher PVR categories (90.5, 85.0, 78.0, and 79.5 mL/min/1.73 m² for <50, 50–99, 100–149, and ≥150 mL, respectively). Overall differences between groups were statistically significant (p < 0.001) (Table 3, Figure 1).
Table 3. eGFR according to postvoid residual urine volume categories
| PVR category |
eGFR median (IQR) |
| <50 mL |
90.5 (83.0–96.0) |
| 50–99 mL |
85.0 (76.5–92.0) |
| 100–149 mL |
78.0 (70.0–86.0) |
| ≥150 mL |
79.5 (68.0–89.0) |
Kruskal–Wallis test, p < 0.001.
Abbreviations: IQR, interquartile range; PVR, postvoid residual urine volume; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate
In multivariable linear regression analysis including age, BMI, PV, IPSS, Qmax, Qavg, and PVR, only age and PVR (both p < 0.001) remained independently associated with eGFR. Neither BMI, IPSS, PV, nor urinary flow parameters showed a significant independent association with eGFR (all p > 0.05). The overall model explained 27.0% of the variability in eGFR (R² = 0.270, adjusted R² = 0.238, p < 0.001) (Table 4).
Table 4. Multivariable linear regression analysis for factors independently associated with eGFR
| Variable | β | B (95% CI) | p value |
| Age | -0.369 | -0.651 (-0.899 to -0.403) | <0.001 |
| BMI | -0.132 | -0.391 (-0.790 to 0.008) | 0.055 |
| PV | 0.078 | 0.027 (-0.022 to 0.077) | 0.279 |
| IPSS | -0.026 | -0.068 (-0.424 to 0.287) | 0.704 |
| Qmax | -0.157 | -0.516 (-1.165 to 0.132) | 0.118 |
| Qavg | 0.114 | 0.760 (-0.555 to 2.076) | 0.255 |
| PVR | -0.288 | -0.050 (-0.074 to -0.026) | <0.001 |
Model statistics: R² = 0.270; adjusted R² = 0.238; F = 8.649; p < 0.001.
β, standardized regression coefficient; B, unstandardized regression coefficient; CI, confidence interval; BMI, body mass index; PV, prostate volume; IPSS, International Prostate Symptom Score; Qmax, maximum urinary flow rate; Qavg, average urinary flow rate; PVR, postvoid residual urine volume; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate.
RESULTS
A total of 172 patients were included in the final analysis. The median age was 67 years, median IPSS was 21, median Qmax was 9.0 mL/s, and median PVR was 100 mL. The median eGFR was 84 mL/min/1.73 m² (Table 1).
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the study population
| Variable |
Value |
| Age (years), median (IQR) |
67 (63–72) |
| BMI (kg/m²), mean ± SD |
27.6 ± 4.0 |
| Total PSA (ng/mL), median (IQR) |
3.0 (1.6–9.0) |
| PV (mL), median (IQR) |
65 (50–87.5) |
| IPSS, median (IQR) |
21 (18–24) |
| Qmax (mL/s), median (IQR) |
9.0 (7.2–11.4) |
| Qavg (mL/s), median (IQR) |
4.0 (3.1–5.2) |
| PVR (mL), median (IQR) |
100 (45–150) |
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m²), median (IQR) |
84 (72–91) |
| Serum creatinine (mg/dL), median (IQR) |
0.93 (0.83–1.04) |
Abbreviations: IQR, interquartile range; SD, standard deviation; BMI, body mass index; PSA, prostate-specific antigen; PV, prostate volume; IPSS, International Prostate Symptom Score; Qmax, maximum urinary flow rate; Qavg, average urinary flow rate; PVR, postvoid residual urine volume; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate.
Spearman’s correlation analysis showed that PVR and age had a moderate negative correlation with eGFR (both p < 0.001). In addition, no significant correlation was observed between eGFR and BMI, PSA, PV, IPSS, Qmax, or Qavg (all p > 0.05) (Table 2).
Table 2. Correlation between eGFR and clinical parameters
| Variable |
Spearman rho |
p value |
| Age |
-0.453 |
<0.001 |
| BMI |
-0.096 |
0.209 |
| Total PSA |
0.012 |
0.880 |
| PV |
-0.135 |
0.078 |
| IPSS |
-0.079 |
0.304 |
| Qmax |
-0.105 |
0.172 |
| Qavg |
-0.052 |
0.501 |
| PVR |
-0.356 |
<0.001 |
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; PSA, prostate-specific antigen; PV, prostate volume; IPSS, International Prostate Symptom Score; Qmax, maximum urinary flow rate; Qavg, average urinary flow rate; PVR, postvoid residual urine volume; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate.
Median eGFR values were generally lower in the higher PVR categories (90.5, 85.0, 78.0, and 79.5 mL/min/1.73 m² for <50, 50–99, 100–149, and ≥150 mL, respectively). Overall differences between groups were statistically significant (p < 0.001) (Table 3, Figure 1).
Table 3. eGFR according to postvoid residual urine volume categories
| PVR category |
eGFR median (IQR) |
| <50 mL |
90.5 (83.0–96.0) |
| 50–99 mL |
85.0 (76.5–92.0) |
| 100–149 mL |
78.0 (70.0–86.0) |
| ≥150 mL |
79.5 (68.0–89.0) |
Kruskal–Wallis test, p < 0.001.
Abbreviations: IQR, interquartile range; PVR, postvoid residual urine volume; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate
In multivariable linear regression analysis including age, BMI, PV, IPSS, Qmax, Qavg, and PVR, only age and PVR (both p < 0.001) remained independently associated with eGFR. Neither BMI, IPSS, PV, nor urinary flow parameters showed a significant independent association with eGFR (all p > 0.05). The overall model explained 27.0% of the variability in eGFR (R² = 0.270, adjusted R² = 0.238, p < 0.001) (Table 4).
Table 4. Multivariable linear regression analysis for factors independently associated with eGFR
| Variable | β | B (95% CI) | p value |
| Age | -0.369 | -0.651 (-0.899 to -0.403) | <0.001 |
| BMI | -0.132 | -0.391 (-0.790 to 0.008) | 0.055 |
| PV | 0.078 | 0.027 (-0.022 to 0.077) | 0.279 |
| IPSS | -0.026 | -0.068 (-0.424 to 0.287) | 0.704 |
| Qmax | -0.157 | -0.516 (-1.165 to 0.132) | 0.118 |
| Qavg | 0.114 | 0.760 (-0.555 to 2.076) | 0.255 |
| PVR | -0.288 | -0.050 (-0.074 to -0.026) | <0.001 |
Model statistics: R² = 0.270; adjusted R² = 0.238; F = 8.649; p < 0.001.
β, standardized regression coefficient; B, unstandardized regression coefficient; CI, confidence interval; BMI, body mass index; PV, prostate volume; IPSS, International Prostate Symptom Score; Qmax, maximum urinary flow rate; Qavg, average urinary flow rate; PVR, postvoid residual urine volume; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate.